<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Statistics hero Nate Silver predicts Oscar results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.5circles.com/wordpress/blog/2009/02/nate-silver-oscars/mike-pritchard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.5circles.com/wordpress/blog/2009/02/nate-silver-oscars/mike-pritchard/</link>
	<description>Market Research Commentary with an Edge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 16:13:03 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Pritchard (That Research Guy)</title>
		<link>http://www.5circles.com/wordpress/blog/2009/02/nate-silver-oscars/mike-pritchard/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Pritchard (That Research Guy)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 20:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.5circles.com/wordpress/blog/?p=53#comment-26</guid>
		<description>Funny you should mention the post event analysis.  I tweeted 

&lt;blockquote&gt;Nate Silver gets it wrong! (supporting actress)&lt;/blockquote&gt;

but I didn&#039;t update the blog post.  If I remember correctly, he was wrong on the only prediction that was not obvious.  C&#039;est la vie.

At the WTIA predictions dinner in Seattle, there is usually some continuity in the panel, and so they have to &#039;fess up on how well they did from the previous year.

A while back, I used to attend the PriceWaterhouse technology predictions events (can&#039;t remember the title).  These were based on work done internally by some of the senior analysts - largely interview based I think.  The presenter was asked what was his biggest failure, to which he responded &#039;the Blackberry&#039;.  He was bemused by its rapid takeoff, and the fact that many of his colleagues were suffering from &#039;carpal thumb syndrome&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny you should mention the post event analysis.  I tweeted </p>
<blockquote><p>Nate Silver gets it wrong! (supporting actress)</p></blockquote>
<p>but I didn&#8217;t update the blog post.  If I remember correctly, he was wrong on the only prediction that was not obvious.  C&#8217;est la vie.</p>
<p>At the WTIA predictions dinner in Seattle, there is usually some continuity in the panel, and so they have to &#8216;fess up on how well they did from the previous year.</p>
<p>A while back, I used to attend the PriceWaterhouse technology predictions events (can&#8217;t remember the title).  These were based on work done internally by some of the senior analysts &#8211; largely interview based I think.  The presenter was asked what was his biggest failure, to which he responded &#8216;the Blackberry&#8217;.  He was bemused by its rapid takeoff, and the fact that many of his colleagues were suffering from &#8216;carpal thumb syndrome&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaremy</title>
		<link>http://www.5circles.com/wordpress/blog/2009/02/nate-silver-oscars/mike-pritchard/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 20:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.5circles.com/wordpress/blog/?p=53#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Nate Silver is absolutely fascinating to me. He has done (and continues to do) a great deal of work for Baseball Prospectus looking at oft-ignored or underutilized statistics. It was great to see him take that same approach with the 2008 election, and it&#039;s fun that he did the same for the Oscars. Did anyone analyze his results afterward? It&#039;s always amusing to me that nobody ever really analyzes analysts&#039; analyses. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nate Silver is absolutely fascinating to me. He has done (and continues to do) a great deal of work for Baseball Prospectus looking at oft-ignored or underutilized statistics. It was great to see him take that same approach with the 2008 election, and it&#8217;s fun that he did the same for the Oscars. Did anyone analyze his results afterward? It&#8217;s always amusing to me that nobody ever really analyzes analysts&#8217; analyses. <img src='http://www.5circles.com/wordpress/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
